![moonfakery](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 130
- 2 166 927
moonfakery
Russia
Приєднався 18 лис 2010
Ходил ли человек по Луне? - Исследование легенды
They Lost the Blueprints for Crying Out Loud!
I’ve been wondering: how did they manage to achieve that back then, but for over 50 years now, they haven’t been able to repeat it?
I have an answer. They said they lost the blueprints for crying out loud! Are you serious? I’m not joking!
Channel One Russia. Show: Time Will Tell. Episode from January 22, 2025.
I have an answer. They said they lost the blueprints for crying out loud! Are you serious? I’m not joking!
Channel One Russia. Show: Time Will Tell. Episode from January 22, 2025.
Переглядів: 202
Відео
Lights, Camera, Action! AstroBloopers of the First Commercial Spacewalk | Leonid Konovalov
Переглядів 751Місяць тому
Cinematographer LEONID KONOVALOV is unveiling the cinematic magic behind the first commercial spacewalk. How was it filmed? During the discussion, a more profound question arose. Did the Polaris Dawn mission even take place at all? Perhaps none of the four astronauts actually flew anywhere in the Dragon 2 spacecraft, never went into low Earth orbit, and instead, the amateur astronaut-actors spe...
The Moon Hoax Revisited, Part 5.2. Apollo at the Murmansk pier | R.Golunov
Переглядів 381Місяць тому
The year 1970 is a particularly intriguing one. It marks a turning point in the Moon race, where the Soviet leadership shifted from implicit consent regarding Moon missions to a somewhat passive yet visibly cooperative stance with their competitor. This was a highly unusual situation. Of course, one should by no means accuse the Soviet leadership of lacking intelligence or foresight; clearly, s...
The Moon Hoax Revisited, Part 5.1. Apollo at the Murmansk pier | A.Popov
Переглядів 6792 місяці тому
The year 1970 is a particularly intriguing one. It marks a turning point in the Moon race, where the Soviet leadership shifted from implicit consent regarding Moon missions to a somewhat passive yet visibly cooperative stance with their competitor. This was a highly unusual situation. Of course, one should by no means accuse the Soviet leadership of lacking intelligence or foresight; clearly, s...
The Moon Hoax Revisited, Part 4. What's Wrong with the Rocket? | A.Popov
Переглядів 1,2 тис.3 місяці тому
Ph.D. Alexander Popov discusses NASA's Moon Hoax. In the fourth part, he discusses the American Moon rocket Apollo 11/Saturn V. At the end, A. Popov answered a question from the audience. Alexander Popov PhD graduated from the Moscow Engineering Physics Institute (MEPhI) Department of Experimental and theoretical physics in 1966. He worked in special design departments, but mostly in MEPhI. Pop...
Polaris Dawn or Polaris Down? Was the Spacewalk Real?
Переглядів 6964 місяці тому
On September 12, 2024, NASA performed the very first EVA by space tourists… or didn’t it? From Dawn to Down: Unpacking the Polaris Spacewalk Spin.
The Moon Hoax Revisited, Part 3 | A.Popov
Переглядів 8085 місяців тому
Ph.D. Alexander Popov discusses NASA's Moon Hoax. In the third part, he discusses the consequences of the moon hoax for the fates of the USSR and the USA. At the end, A. Popov answered a question from the audience. Alexander Popov PhD graduated from the Moscow Engineering Physics Institute (MEPhI) Department of Experimental and theoretical physics in 1966. He worked in special design department...
The Moon Hoax Revisited, Part 2 | A.Popov
Переглядів 9936 місяців тому
Ph.D. Alexander Popov discusses NASA's Moon Hoax. In the second part, he explains why it took NASA 17 years to design and build a replacement for the Space Shuttle, while back in the 1960s, it took just 7 years to build three different successful spacecraft. At the end, A. Popov answered a question from the audience. Alexander Popov PhD graduated from the Moscow Engineering Physics Institute (M...
From Mercury to Apollo, Part 9 | A.Nikitin
Переглядів 4626 місяців тому
What became of the astronauts who participated in the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs? Are there any peculiarities or similarities with the life paths of Soviet cosmonauts? This and more in the final episode of the series From Mercury to Apollo. Source: ua-cam.com/video/UcTVLaC3_ZU/v-deo.html
From Mercury to Apollo, Part 8 | A.Nikitin
Переглядів 3616 місяців тому
Fairytale flights in the fairytale Gemini program. What the astronauts did and how they felt. About this and more in the continuation of the series From Mercury to Apollo. Source: ua-cam.com/video/HbY8BT_VWTM/v-deo.html
From Mercury to Apollo, Part 7 | A.Nikitin
Переглядів 3256 місяців тому
Unjustly overshadowed in terms of its fantastical nature, the Gemini project was a dress rehearsal for the Apollo program. While reviewing the Gemini project, it becomes clear that the Gemini spacecraft was a bucket of bolts and nuts. Source : ua-cam.com/video/45n3qStQuro/v-deo.html
From Mercury to Apollo, Part 6 | A.Nikitin
Переглядів 2607 місяців тому
In this series, we analyze the Soviet Voskhod program: how it was similar to the Gemini project, in what aspects it surpassed or excelled, and where it was supposed to excel compared to its American counterpart. Source: ua-cam.com/video/hTiNqa6yA-w/v-deo.html
From Mercury to Apollo, Part 5 | A.Nikitin
Переглядів 3337 місяців тому
The first American astronauts, the Magnificent Seven. We are trying to make sense of all the Mercury missions. Source : ua-cam.com/video/A6aq1tceab8/v-deo.html
From Mercury to Apollo, Part 4 | A.Nikitin
Переглядів 2767 місяців тому
The American space project Mercury. The spacecraft design, launch vehicles, and other details of the first US manned missions. We are trying to answer the question: was it even possible to get to space and return back using this “technology”? Source: ua-cam.com/video/Z_nVd3PfTF0/v-deo.html
From Mercury to Apollo, Part 3 | A.Nikitin
Переглядів 3757 місяців тому
The beginning of the Soviet manned space program. The Vostok program to put the first Soviet cosmonauts into low Earth orbit and return them safely. The Soviet space dog missions as a preparatory stage before human missions. A brief overview of all six Vostok missions with humans on board. Source: ua-cam.com/video/2ZNadG8N-NI/v-deo.html
From Mercury to Apollo, Part 2 | A.Nikitin
Переглядів 2817 місяців тому
From Mercury to Apollo, Part 2 | A.Nikitin
From Mercury to Apollo, Part 1 | A.Nikitin
Переглядів 5447 місяців тому
From Mercury to Apollo, Part 1 | A.Nikitin
V.Lebedev, Diary of a Cosmonaut | A.Nikitin
Переглядів 5477 місяців тому
V.Lebedev, Diary of a Cosmonaut | A.Nikitin
Puppet-Show on the Moon | L.Konovalov
Переглядів 2,5 тис.8 місяців тому
Puppet-Show on the Moon | L.Konovalov
The Moon Hoax Revisited, Part 1 | A.Popov
Переглядів 2,2 тис.8 місяців тому
The Moon Hoax Revisited, Part 1 | A.Popov
Imitation of the Apollo 11 launch | L. Konovalov
Переглядів 1,9 тис.9 місяців тому
Imitation of the Apollo 11 launch | L. Konovalov
How the First US Spacewalk Was Filmed
Переглядів 6839 місяців тому
How the First US Spacewalk Was Filmed
Apollo 17: Decoding the Lunar Deception
Переглядів 2,2 тис.10 місяців тому
Apollo 17: Decoding the Lunar Deception
Peregrine Mission One: Why Can't Americans Repeat the Moon Landing in Half a Century?
Переглядів 790Рік тому
Peregrine Mission One: Why Can't Americans Repeat the Moon Landing in Half a Century?
The Russian cosmonaut Svetlana Savitskaya on the sinking of the Mir space station
Переглядів 326Рік тому
The Russian cosmonaut Svetlana Savitskaya on the sinking of the Mir space station
Cinematographer Leonid Konovalov reveals Apollo trickery
Переглядів 2,2 тис.Рік тому
Cinematographer Leonid Konovalov reveals Apollo trickery
Former head of the Russian Space Agency asks questions about alleged moon landings
Переглядів 834Рік тому
Former head of the Russian Space Agency asks questions about alleged moon landings
Кинооператор Леонид Коновалов: Обращение на Бумстартере к подписчикам
Переглядів 6752 роки тому
Кинооператор Леонид Коновалов: Обращение на Бумстартере к подписчикам
Crew 1 Dragon - great physical shape after 6 months in zero-G
Переглядів 1,2 тис.3 роки тому
Crew 1 Dragon - great physical shape after 6 months in zero-G
Great video. Unfortunately, I've encountered someone named SolarChronicle AKA ,Aurora, Apollokid, Hobbes and most likely a few others. It's a bit of a common theme amongst some believers. He claims this video is deceitful. Quote "You have been caught in a deceitful lie. The footage in the link you provided was cropped to not show Edgar Mitchell manipulating the flag." It's this kind of denial and stupidity that discredit their efforts even further. I'm trying to understand how something can be cropped and show more. Of course, he has a litany of insults directed toward deniers. I've asked him to share his views here. It's pure comedy. Everyone deserves a chuckle. I'm sure many have had encounters with a few like this.
😂".. You d#$m A#$
ua-cam.com/video/qfCaJhP7EPI/v-deo.htmlsi=_FsRgsOiMDTsGaBO Представьте, как круто будет, когда АМЕРИКАНСКИЕ астронавты ВПЕРВЫЕ установят флаг на другой планете!" На 1:57
кстати, Вы видели речь Маска на инаугурации Трампа? Он там интересные слова говорит, которые можно довольно двусмысленно истолковать. Про высадку на Марс. Мол, когда эта высадка осуществится (американцами, конечно:)), то это БУДЕТ В ПЕРВЫЙ РАЗ, КОГДА ЧЕЛОВЕК ВЫСАДИТСЯ НА ДРУГОЙ ПЛАНЕТЕ. Очень двусмысленные слова. С одной стороны, их можно истолковать, конечно, в том смысле, что, мол, Луна-то это не настоящая планета, а только спутник Земли. Но, с другой стороны, истолковать их можно и как отрицание предыдущих высадок на Луну.
кстати, Вы видели речь Маска на инаугурации Трампа? Он там интересные слова говорит, которые можно довольно двусмысленно истолковать. Про высадку на Марс. Мол, когда эта высадка осуществится (американцами, конечно:)), то это БУДЕТ В ПЕРВЫЙ РАЗ, КОГДА ЧЕЛОВЕК ВЫСАДИТСЯ НА ДРУГОЙ ПЛАНЕТЕ. Очень двусмысленные слова. С одной стороны, их можно истолковать, конечно, в том смысле, что, мол, Луна-то это не настоящая планета, а только спутник Земли. Но, с другой стороны, истолковать их можно и как отрицание предыдущих высадок на Луну
кстати, Вы видели речь Маска на инаугурации Трампа? Он там интересные слова говорит, которые можно довольно двусмысленно истолковать. Про высадку на Марс. Мол, когда эта высадка осуществится (американцами, конечно:)), то это БУДЕТ В ПЕРВЫЙ РАЗ, КОГДА ЧЕЛОВЕК ВЫСАДИТСЯ НА ДРУГОЙ ПЛАНЕТЕ. Очень двусмысленные слова. С одной стороны, их можно истолковать, конечно, в том смысле, что, мол, Луна-то это не настоящая планета, а только спутник Земли. Но, с другой стороны, истолковать их можно и как отрицание предыдущих высадок на Луну.
кстати, Вы видели речь Маска на инаугурации Трампа? Он там интересные слова говорит, которые можно довольно двусмысленно истолковать. Про высадку на Марс. Мол, когда эта высадка осуществится (американцами, конечно:)), то это БУДЕТ В ПЕРВЫЙ РАЗ, КОГДА ЧЕЛОВЕК ВЫСАДИТСЯ НА ДРУГОЙ ПЛАНЕТЕ. Очень двусмысленные слова. С одной стороны, их можно истолковать, конечно, в том смысле, что, мол, Луна-то это не настоящая планета, а только спутник Земли. Но, с другой стороны, истолковать их можно и как отрицание предыдущих высадок на Луну.
Russian version: dzen.ru/video/watch/670001ab303c8129caa6d6bb
а ролики на русском ?
dzen.ru/video/watch/670001ab303c8129caa6d6bb
I was 7 in ‘69 the technology was a joke.
Thanks, Keep up the good work.
exactly
Thanks for the Upload once more 👍🍻
I found lots of mind-boggling evidence of Apollo fakery in this channel ua-cam.com/channels/CEcxsEpjpHxvCFksvgjiGg.html
Thanks
If NASA is planning to fake a Mars landing, the sets from Capricorn One might still be available.
пендымерзкиелжецы...
My government thinks we're all fools....unfortunately many are.
Our government are the fools.. Elect a clown, you get a circus.
AOK7 will delete his comment in 3...2...1...👇🏻
You specifically said. "The footage in the link you provided was cropped to not show Edgar Mitchell manipulating the flag."
@aok4418 I never said that, you lying flerf 🤣🤪. Show me where and when I "said" it. I dare you to try.
@@Aurora666_yt Why isn't there a single identified spec of dust on those landing pads? Why did NASA delete photos and add photos later? The famous photo with the letter "C" on was removed and later added. The letter is no longer there. You can clearly see the use of artificial light sources exposing shadows that are not indicative of the sunlight. How did NASA bring back hundreds of kilograms of moon rock when they clearly had issues with fuel and weight? Why are there missions with the exact same back-drop, yet Apollo claims every site was different? The materials in the Hasselblad are cast aluminum, plastic, and glass. Which one of those materials offers protection from ionizing radiation? How did the film survive such harsh temperatures, yet there is no evidence of radiation exposure, cracking, or shrinking? The photos are obvious. Don't bother denying it. You don't have two peoples shadows roughly the same height, standing about three feet apart converging or being about twice in size unless it's artificial light. Are you going to tell me next that the photo AS16-107-17446 wasn't edited? The original is still online. Also, are you going to tell me the shadows aren't pointing in completely different directions?
@Aurora666_yt Now, you're just lying again. That's exactly what you said.
@aok4418 Don't be such a sore loser . The liar is YOU since you put words in people's mouth. It shows you're one massive DECEIT .
ТАкой ваще крутой))Улыбка просто огонь
This is one of two videos I've seen that give me reason to question the validity of Apollo. But i need some more information. Where did moonfakery get this video? He doesn't say. He says the astronauts are in the module but how do we know that's true? I need some way to corroborate his claims.
@@gives_bad_advice Because he references the mission report and time stamp.
@aok4418 Is this out of NASA archives?
@@gives_bad_advice Yeah.
@@gives_bad_advice No, it's out of his rear end.
You mean sound travels thru' other materials other than air? Hahahaha!! Wood, metal, water, air a man's bones all transfer sound.
When the fraud is finally admitted there will be massive parades celebrating how successful my American government was in winning the cold war with LIES.
When will you admit that you're wrong? Oh that's never.... That's why you cling to this debate, you can always poo poo away hard evidence and feel superior.
Прости Юра, мы все про....ли...
NASA Moon Landing simulator: ua-cam.com/video/9_bPFmVVlFk/v-deo.html
They did not have the ability to determine exposure rates. How could NASA determine radiation exposure levels when they didn't even have dosimeters to determine exposure? Every time someone decides to quote NASA, they are shooting themselves in the foot. Their data reflect numbers from LEO. We already know this thanks to just about every bit independent scientific research regarding space radiation. Even the NCRP Report No. 98 estimate that a crew on the lunar surface at the time of the event would have received a skin dose of 600 rem and a dose to the blood-forming organs of 130 rem.
Гагарин- наша гордость. Он был ,есть и будет всегда достоянием нашей страны и мы все должны брать с него пример как надо любить свою страну,свой народ
Улыбка Русского Человека 🙂🇷🇺💖
I think the mission was real but i always has been sceptical about their EVA conducting above 400 km altitude , this video explains really well . another problem was its Apogee 1400 km with human . i cant believe human can withstand van Allen belts radiation on that altitude , great hairsplitting analysis of American EVE during 1965 till 1983. thanks
Osvětlení není od Slunce je umělé.
Proof this is totally faked by NASA.
Disliked 👎🏻
@@Aurora666_yt The health effects of space radiation on astronauts represent a major limiting factor for long-duration human space missions beyond Low Earth Orbit. Beyond LEO, the most important sources of space radiation consist of galactic cosmic rays and Solar Particle Events. GCR nuclei of average energy can penetrate a substantial thickness of materials on the order of 10s to 100s of centimeters of water or aluminum. If a nuclear interaction between a primary GCR ion and a target nucleus occurs, the lighter secondary products will lose energy at a lower rate, and therefore will be able to penetrate even further. For this reason, it is not possible to provide sufficient shielding material to fully absorb all types of radiation in space. In addition, the relative biological effectiveness of nuclei will change as a function of depth of penetration because the composition and energy of the nuclei change due to atomic and nuclear interactions. The Linear Energy Transfer (LET) of each nucleus also changes as it loses energy and slows down inside the material being penetrated. One of the most interesting of Van Allen's findings was that once protons and electrons hit the aluminum skin of the spacecraft, they would turn into x-rays. The kind the average dentist protects patients against with two inch lead vests. Those rays would naturally penetrate the astronaut's bodies and create anything from nausea and vomiting to eventual death, depending on the length of the exposure.
The only thing this video proves is that if you have a talent for it you can make everything look fake when it actually happened and there will always be people who fall for it. Reason: lack of knowledge of the subject.
There you go again. Where are your other accounts? SolarChronicle DemonDrummer yazzamx6380 Aurora666_yt ApolloKid1961
There you go again. Where are your other accounts? SolarChronicle DemonDrummer yazzamx6380 Aurora666_yt ApolloKid1961
I'm still laughing at this comment you made earlier. "cosmic ray exposure, 1 week to the moon and back is equivalent to 3 weeks in low Earth orbit." The radiation levels around the ISS increase by a factor of about 30. In just one week on the ISS, astronauts are exposed to the equivalent of one year's exposure on the ground. So, how do you equate the total exposure data from Apollo to this? Taking for example, the Apollo 11 flight daily dose of 0.22mGy, and dividing by 24 to find a dose rate of 0.00916 per 60 minutes, gives a dose rate of 0.038014 for a period of 249 minutes. This is about twice as much as that registered by the ISS, namely 0.015mGy for the 270 minutes of the Orion test. Taking this time of 270 and doing the same calculation, the Apollo 11 data would only be marginally increased to 0.04mGy. These figures are nowhere near the 15.1mGy registered by Orion but they are near to the figures registered by Apollo missions operating in LEO. When comparing this Apollo 11 outcome with Apollo 7, which was acknowledged to be orbiting in LEO with a perigee of 229 and an apogee of 309 miles, (the top end of the ISS comfort zone) we find Apollo 7 with a 0.025mGy against 0.04m for Apollo 11. Not really believing these results, I then thought to check out the Apollo flight that had been attributed the highest doses of radiation: Apollo 14 received a 1.27 daily dose rate which comes to 0.219mGy for those 249 minutes. All the Apollo flight radiation data in the NCRP table compare more closely with the ISS-TEPC data from LEO than they do with the Orion RAM figures.
@@aok4418 Quit being a crybaby 🤓
The radiation levels around the ISS increase by a factor of about 30. In just one week on the ISS, astronauts are exposed to the equivalent of one year's exposure on the ground. So, how do you equate the total exposure data from Apollo to this? Taking for example, the Apollo 11 flight daily dose of 0.22mGy, and dividing by 24 to find a dose rate of 0.00916 per 60 minutes, gives a dose rate of 0.038014 for a period of 249 minutes. This is about twice as much as that registered by the ISS, namely 0.015mGy for the 270 minutes of the Orion test. Taking this time of 270 and doing the same calculation, the Apollo 11 data would only be marginally increased to 0.04mGy. These figures are nowhere near the 15.1mGy registered by Orion, but they are near to the figures registered by Apollo missions operating in LEO. When comparing this Apollo 11 outcome with Apollo 7, which was acknowledged to be orbiting in LEO with a perigee of 229 and an apogee of 309 miles, (the top end of the ISS comfort zone) we find Apollo 7 with a 0.025mGy against 0.04m for Apollo 11. The Apollo flight that had been attributed to the highest doses of radiation: Apollo 14 received a 1.27 daily dose rate, which comes to 0.219mGy for those 249 minutes. All the Apollo flight radiation data in the NCRP table compare more closely with the ISS-TEPC data from LEO than they do with the Orion RAM figures. The fact that the Apollo data is out of synch with the ISS and Orion might explain why it is totally ignored by the industry today. It would also explain the problems surrounding this BIRD report.
Pin this … Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.
Why?
Air Plane Pilots fear just hours of X-rays at 5 miles above Earth. At 250 miles above Earth, ISS Astronauts get 20 times the exposure to X-rays, for months. Space is fake.
Are you serious with this voice over garbage?
😆
Happy New Year - and thanks again for the upload 👍
another great appointment with the phenomenal Leonid! Thank you Leonid for these studies and professional analyses that make us understand many things and above all after where they are going... dragging us innocents too!!! еще одна замечательная встреча с феноменальным Леонидом! Спасибо Леониду за эти исследования и профессиональный анализ, которые помогают нам понять многие вещи и, прежде всего, куда они идут... тащат нас, невинных, тоже!!!
Отлично. Я в мордокнигу закинул. С новым годом, дружище!!!
Космоклоунада..Сегодня любой школьник знает, что у нас над головой термо атомный реактор (ТАР), где вращаются солнце и луна вокруг северного магнитного полюса земли, который с 2019 года стремительно смещается на восток... А судя по "лунной карте земли" у нас над головой в полнолунье , ua-cam.com/video/3wU8_jT61eE/v-deo.html , и которую невозможно подделать или исказить, выходит, что наш круг земной намного больше, чем нам показывают на эмблеме ООН, как и континентов на нём, и что это именно мы сегодня живём в библейском ноевом ковчеге (убежище, части большего круга земного, колесе сансары), который создали в J.666 (1884) году из того, что уцелело- солнца и луны после термоядерной климатической катастрофы условного 666-го лета от с.м., и где собрали с безжизненных территорий "всякой твари по паре"..
MyComDeleted🎯
Great job! They've nailed it again, which is quite uncommon... The USA will probably never admit to faking the Apollo, Gemini and Mercury missions, but many people are starting to find it suspicious. ua-cam.com/video/YymcF6gDd28/v-deo.htmlsi=hv9wW2fBF5yVFQiE
the jewish Jared Taylor Isaacman...
happy new year
55:00 the Edward White Gemini space walk is stop no motion animation. Also other tricks. ua-cam.com/video/6zz53zVKNhQ/v-deo.html
Love from italy!
Spot on.
Billionaires dont risk their lives on remote controlled rockets.
36:07 Workout in Zero Gravity. You can do isometric training on the spot. Example: Pushing or pulling your left hand against the right hand.
Why is it that since the 1960s only USA has sent people to the moon? Red flags
SO many reatrds these days.